The numbers are in, and for once in American healthcare, some of them are good. Host Erik Sunset breaks down the KLAS Research Arch Collaborative Clinician EHR Experience 2026 report — 92 health systems, 121,000 clinicians, one year of data — and what it reveals about where the industry is winning, where it’s still falling short, and what’s actually driving the gap.
Most clinicians report a moderate to strong EHR experience, but the divide between physicians and nurses is striking: 22% of physician groups reached the top satisfaction tier compared to just 12% of nurses. The standout finding for physicians? Ambient AI is delivering, and the data backs it up.
Erik also covers what’s still broken — training, governance, vendor relationships, and the lowest-scoring category in the entire industry: external data integration. If you work in healthcare and have an opinion about the EHR, this episode is required listening.
Links from the show:
Click to expand and read this episode's transcript.
📍 📍 There is a number in American healthcare that almost nobody talks about, and it’s not a drug price, and it’s not an insurance premium. It’s how your doctor feels about the computer screen in front of them. Today, we’re going inside a brand-new report from our good friends at KLAS Research, the Arch Collaborative’s Clinician EHR Experience twenty twenty-six. Ninety-two health systems, over one hundred and twenty-one thousand clinicians, one year of data. And what it tells us about nurses, about doctors, about the machines we’ve asked them to work with might surprise you. Stick around 📍 okay, let’s start with the headline because the headline is actually good news, and you don’t hear that much these days. According to KLAS, most clinicians surveyed this year report a moderate to strong experience with their electronic health record. Not perfect, not universal, but moderate to strong. In an industry that has spent two decades being told the EHR is the enemy, that’s worth sitting with for a second. But, and there’s always a but, the report draws a hard line between two groups: physicians and nurses, and the gap is real. Twenty-two percent of physician populations surveyed landed in the top satisfaction tier, what KLAS calls Level Six Elite. Twenty-two percent, that’s nearly one in four physician groups performing at the very top of the scale. Nurses, twelve percent. Now think about that. Nurses are the ones charting at the bedside hour after hour, shift after shift, and they are less than half as likely as physicians to land in that elite tier. KLAS doesn’t speculate as to why the numbers we’re citing tonight, but they do tell us what’s changed and what hasn’t. Here’s the part that should get the attention of every hospital administrator in this country. Organizations that went back and remeasured, that surveyed their clinicians a second time, saw their net EHR experience score climb by an average of six point two points. And seven of those organizations didn’t just improve, they jumped fifteen points or more Let that sink in. This isn’t a fixed condition. This isn’t the EHR is just bad, live with it. This is a solvable problem. The data proves it moves when leadership actually measures it and acts. So what’s actually working? Let’s break it down by role because the report does. For nurses, the wins this year came from three places: better documentation and charting tools, improved navigation through the system, and what KLAS calls smart tools, macros, copy forward functionality, smart phrases. The unglamorous, unsexy back-office stuff that quietly saves a nurse ten seconds here, 30 seconds there, which multiplied across a 12-hour shift is the difference between a bearable day and a brutal one. For physicians, one thing stands out above everything else in this report: ambient AI. Speech-based documentation. The report names it directly as the standout win of the year for physicians, alongside better workflows and better order sets. Doctors are talking to their patients, and the machine quietly in the background is doing the writing. That’s not a talking point. That’s what the data says clinicians are actually responding to. Now, here’s where the report gets honest, and I respect that because most industry research doesn’t. KLAS is clear that there is still real work to do. Training structure, communication around system upgrades, giving clinicians an actual voice in governance, not a suggestion box, a voice. Efficiency, the vendor relationship itself And then there’s the one that KLAS flags as the worst performing category in the entire industry, full stop: external data integration. Getting information to move between systems, between hospitals, between health systems, between the 50 different software platforms that make up American healthcare remains, according to this report, the lowest-scoring area nationwide. Think about that the next time you’re asked to fill out the same medical history form for the fourth time in one calendar year. And one more thing worth flagging because it tells you where this is all heading. Starting with the twenty twenty-six survey cycle, KLAS added new required questions specifically about AI usage and adoption among clinicians. And that’s not a footnote. That’s an industry-wide research organization telling 92 health systems, “We now consider your relationship with AI a core measurement of clinician experience, not an optional add-on.” That tells you everything about where twenty twenty-six sits in this story. We are past the point of asking whether AI belongs in the exam room. The only question left is whether it’s implemented well. Finally, credit where it’s due, the report highlights the twenty twenty-five Pinnacle Award and Breakthrough Recognition winners, organizations that KLAS singled out for real, measurable improvement in the clinician’s experience. So shout out to Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Houston Methodist, Parkview Health, Mercy Health. And these aren’t small operations. These are major systems that decided this problem was worth solving, and according to the data, actually solved it. So here’s where I land, and I’ll say it plainly. The story of the American EHR in twenty twenty-six is not the story we were telling five years ago. It’s not all burnout, all frustration, all doctors drowning in clicks. There is real, measured, documented improvement, especially where ambient AI has entered the picture for physicians and where smarter charting tools have entered the picture for nurses. But the gap between physicians and nurses is real. The integration problem is real, and the organizations that are winning, the Pinnacles, the CHOPs, the Houston Methodists of the world are winning because they measured, and then they acted on what they found That’s it. That’s the whole formula. Measure, act, repeat. So I wanna be sure we thank our friends at KLAS Research and the Arch Collaborative for continuing to do the tough, unglamorous work of actually asking clinicians how they feel and writing it down. And as we wrap up this episode, I wanna be sure that everybody listening knows that whether you’re searching for an ambient AI note-taker, whether you’re searching for a integration platform that actually works, that delivers on the early promise of meaningful use, uh, for everybody listening who’s interested in those things, I would highly recommend you visit docbuddy.com. We’ll be sure to include notes in the episode description that point you directly to DocBuddy’s ambient note-taking solution, as well as our integration hub platform, uh, that makes these wants and wishes from the early and middle and late stages of meaningful use a reality. And on behalf of the entire DocBuddy team, we wanna thank you for listening. Be sure you’re subscribed on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube so you always get the newest episodes of the show. You can also visit docbuddy.com to get all of our backlog. Our entire catalog is there. Thank you very much. Have a great day, and until next time, I’m your host, Eric. Take care.
